SA6 Review and the Competition
February 7, 2008
“They sound really good! My favorite in-ear so far.”
How many have I tried, you ask? Well, I’m including a review I’ve been working on below:
Shure SE530
the good
- Amazing response and clarity
- Selection of ear sleeves allows a proper fit
- iPod seems to drive them as well as my headphone amp
the bad
- Harsh treble; a general problem of canalphones, but more pronounced here
- Less bass on rock tracks than I hoped for with triple armatures
- Awkward/ugly cabling
Ultimate Ears super.fi 5 pro
the good
- Lots of bass (though not with much definition)
- Fantastic sound for $190 (via HeadRoom)
the bad
- Lacking treble
- L/R poorly marked
- They protrude pretty far out of the ears, making me nervous about what could happen if they get bumped
q-JAYS
the good
- Great form factor
- L/R well marked
the bad
- None of my audio sources seemed to drive them properly
- Way too much treble, way too little bass
Etymotic Research ER-4
the good
- Incredible definition without brittle treble
the bad
- Not producing much below 100 Hz (granted, the high definition elsewhere else makes this more noticable)
- Seemed to want to be inserted farther into my ear than anything has a right to go.
- Hard to drive with an iPod, but OK with the Edirol
Sleek Audio (with neutral treble filter and bass port)
the good
- Most balanced sound so far; plenty of bass, plenty of definition, no treble harshness
- Fantastic cabling
- Sounds great on the iPhone
the bad
- L/R poorly marked
- Storage case needs a redesign
- Storage case needs a redesign
Review submitted by: Carl Lumma



Comments
Got something to say?